Christine Pelosi, daughter of current minority
leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca), was on this morning on a nationally televised
broadcast declaring that she was deeply concerned about the integrity of the
election process after other Democrats claimed that Vladimir Putin and the
Russians interfered in the proper election of their deeply flawed candidate,
Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Ms. Pelosi did not seem concerned that her party’s
candidate was seen by most Americans as profoundly unlikeable, dishonest, was
catastrophically careless with highly classified material, and was a
controversial and scandal plagued partisan dating back 30 years to her earliest
days in politics in Little Rock, AR during her equally scandal plagued hubby’s
tenure as governor of Arkansas. No, none
of Hillary Clinton’s political and likely criminal baggage had anything to do
with her loss, those 30 years of scandal and failure were totally
irrelevant. No, Ms. Pelosi insists that
the one and only reason her candidate lost was because Russia had its fingers
in the election, with its thumb solidly on the side of Donald Trump.
“It’s the integrity of the system,” Ms. Pelosi
maintains. “How can the American public
have any faith in our government if foreigners can manipulate our election results?” Where was Christine Pelosi’s concern for the
process during the 2012 presidential elections when large precincts in Maryland
and the District of Columbia verified vote counts that had Barack Obama
receiving 100% of all votes cast, while Mitt Romney received 0%? Not one lousy vote for Mitt, Christine? That would be in any precinct in the U.S.
statistically impossible. But those
kinds of results were perfectly fine with Christine Pelosi. No problem, none whatsoever. The system worked perfectly fine in 2012, as
far as Christine Pelosi was concerned.
Of course she was fine with the system; her guy won.
The reality of the issue here is that a great many
Democrats, including Christine Pelosi, are distressed that they didn’t
win. There is no concern on their part
of the integrity of the system when they win.
They are only concerned about all of this integrity stuff when they
lose.
And regarding all of this ‘hacked’ info obtained by
the Russians and turned over to Wikileaks scoundrel, Julian Assange. Mr. Assange emphatically denies that the
Russians were involved in the information they received from John Podesta’s
email account. Sources from Wikileaks
maintain that rather than the Russians, this info was obtained through internal
disgruntled Democrats. Furthermore, the
information that was released which detailed constant and systematic
skullduggery on the part of high ranking Democrat apparatchiks was never
denied: slimy tactics such as Donna Brazile providing Hillary the upcoming
questions in advance to her high stakes debates with Trump. Or the slimy tricks used by then-DNC
Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl) to undermine Bernie Sanders in his
contest with Hillary Clinton during the primaries.
No, none of these revelations were
denied.
The Democrats are only howling and screeching that
this information was released showing what scumbags run the Democrat
machine. This is the beef Christine
Pelosi has, and not ‘the integrity of the system.’
They were ratted out.
She’s just a sore loser. My advice to Christine Pelosi: buck up, get
over it. You lost on the merits of your
philosophy, and not because somebody robbed you guys. Time for your party to figure out how to
better represent your party to the benefit of voters. Yes, that’s a tall order, but it’s either
that or figure out in the future a way to cheat without getting caught.
I suspect Christine Pelosi and her ilk will opt for
the latter. It’s all they got.
.jpg)
19 comments:
I a democrat tells a lie often enough ...........
The easy solution would be government issued voter identification. Present your card, which is punched, then you vote. That does not favor the Democrats, so they will be against it. They cheat. They've ALWAYS cheated, and the Republicans refuse to hold their feet to the fire. If you have to register for selective service, you can get your voting card AT THE SAME TIME. (the progs would howl)
Pelosi's spawn's claim to fame is being the spawn of a woman known for her wealth and cunning, and nothing else. Who cares what she says? Naturally the corrupt elite media cares, but who else?
As you know, democrats have a very hard time understanding ANY meaning of the word "integrity."
Odie: sure Goebbels 'Big Lie' theory. Tell it often enough, and if it's BIG enough, it will become the truth. Worked for Goebbels...in the short run.
Gorges: oh, they understand the term well enough. A sumo wrestler knows what 'skinny' means. A bank robber knows that you are supposed to fill out a withdrawal slip, and a Democrat knows what integrity consists of. And of course they know that they don't have any.
LL: I kinda like the purple finger thing like they did in Iraq for a few weeks. Indelible purple ink. The Dems wold cry bloody murder if that was proposed.
And that pathetic asswipe, Christine Pelosi. She's just like Hillary Clinton; ride the coat tails of your family, and then once they achieve fame, so do you. Sort of like being born on third base and thinking you hit a triple.
Sort of like being born on third base and thinking you hit a triple.
You come with such perfect analogies, Fredd.
I didn't (sort of) even know Pelosi had kids. Integrity? What's that to a virtue signalling democrat.
Adrienne. That third base analogy was not mine, but apt in this case. These Dem hypocrites hold up integrity as a virtue, and then flush it down the toilet time and again when they need to resort to their usual malfeasance and skulduggery to get things done.
How can you possibly complain about "integrity" when you don't have any?
And not one word of when Obama tried to rig the Israeli elections...
I would just like to see a Dem take responsibility for something they do.
LindaG: I forgot about that one. Dems taking responsibility for the damage they do: hmmm. Maybe when pigs fly.
drjim: Christine Pelosi was one of those beloved 'super delegates,' who were chosen to ensure that the rank and file during the Dem primary did not pick a candidate who didn't measure up to the Dem machine standards. Nothing but integrity in that super delegate system, right drjim?
Foreghners didn't have any influence. So far, only fraud in favor of clinton has been found. They're all on the same page, trying to delegitimize Trump
Kid: I know. The left never gives up. We should take notes, they are relentless.
They will and have lied, cheated, and stole to win.
Fredd, remember the Democrat defense of John Podesta's satanism? An ennui-laden "so what." They didn't even have the basic integrity to deal with content of the damning emails. So for sure, the millionaire socialist Christine Pelosi will doubtless try and cheat by resurrecting the Cold War.
Really? Like it's the 1960s or something? They're not only insane, they're evil. That's what I think and I'm sticking to it.
Odie: you forgot murder, extortion, and all other forms of malfeasance and skulduggery.
Any updates on opinions that Christine Pelosi may have on "Elector Day" today?
LL: perhaps, but not that I would give a damn to follow up on. She's just a liberal piece of shit, and her opinion, thank God, is irrelevant.
Post a Comment