Politics, popular culture and Reagan conservatism spewed maybe once a week...or less
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Liberal hypocrisy on Parade
Just turn on the TV and you can see and hear it with your own eyes and ears: when a liberal speaks, inconsistency and hypocrisy flows from their lips. In other words, they want the rest of us to follow idiotic rules that liberals concoct to keep us all in line, yet they exempt themselves from these rules. The truth behind their hypocrisy is simple: liberals are many times pragmatic about what works and what doesn't. Their gun control measures have utterly failed in the past to prevent gun violence, and so they take up arms to prevent this from happening to themselves. And then these very same hypocrites continue to push for removing guns from the hands of the rest of us of the Great Unwashed - yet these liberal hypocrites keep THEIR guns, and remain armed to the teeth.
Take Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), who has been a pit bull in the rush to grab everyone's guns lately, presumably to end gun violence. Yet she confesses to having a concealed carry permit to pack heat, since the sincere need for her protection is different from you and me, you see. She is more important, and therefore exempt from her own rules she would foist on us all.
Ditto with uber-liberal pinko Rosie O'Donnell, who rants and raves about guns being in the hands of everyday citizens, and yet her own personal body guard is armed to the teeth in his efforts to protect this brazen hypocrite. None of the rest of us deserve protection, oh no. We of the Great Unwashed are too unimportant to warrant protection. Rosie O'Donnell, on the other hand, needs armed protection so that she can continue to rant and rave unfettered about all of those guns in the hands of the rest of us.
Unbelievable. Such inconsistency from our 'betters.'
Of course, posting armed personnel in public schools in order to protect Joe Q. Sixpack's kids creates shrieks of horror from liberals, to include our most liberal president ever, Barack Obama. And yet the president's kids (in private schools, of course, he would NEVER stoop to sending his kids to public schools, public schools are only for those within the Great Unwashed, you know), his precious kids are under armed guard twenty four hours a day.
As for OUR kids, he demands that they spend their educational hours in GUN FREE ZONES.
I think we are starting to see a pattern here: what's good for all of US, as determined by our 'betters,' is unacceptable to impose on those better folk themselves.