A relatively recent concept has changed the world...for the worse. The term 'collateral damage' was never considered in wars of the past.
The manner in which wars were won in the days of yore were simply a matter of the winning side inflicting such damage on the losing side that no other possibility existed other than surrender or annihilation.
In this manner of warfare, the winning side would impose on the losing side every action, thought and philosophy it deemed as the way of life to which all under the victorious regime would abide henceforth, with dissenters killed, imprisoned and otherwise dispatched as the realm saw fit.
Of course, back in 'the good ol' days,' there were no media to cover wars in action, and broadcast to the world the tactics and messiness in general of such conflicts. Now, each and every civilian death is photographed, spread to each corner of the world and denounced by opponents as barbarian, murderous and heinous behavior.
'Collateral damage' came about only recently in human history. It became the rule of combat that soldiers of one side could only target and kill soldiers of the other, leaving be the 'innocent civilians.' If, heaven forbid, a civilian was killed in the course of combat, then a campaign was immediately undertaken to discredit the careless combat unit and its command throughout the world as evil.
Accordingly, with all civilized peoples careful to avoid at all costs (including victory) injuring civilians, the formerly weaker side in any conflict was empowered to use this abhorrence by civilized folk in inflicting collateral damage to its advantage: knowing that their adversaries would not target groupings of known civilian areas such as churches, schools, hospitals and the like, the historically weaker and more ruthless combatants would then entrench themselves and their weapons inside such areas and conduct their attacks with impunity.
Simply setting up rocket launchers, mortars, howitzers and weapons caches inside mosques, hospitals and schools along with a battery of photographers has now given much weaker combatants the upper hand in all warfare now: they know that civilized opponents will not knowingly lob artillery into a school, because if they do the ever present photographers will broadcast to the world the women, children and civilian casualties that the 'evil' warmongers did to the innocents in the population.
Works every time it is tried. But these rules only apply to civilized combatants. Muslim based combat units such as Hamas, al Qaeda, and now ISIS have based their entire war strategy on this fact of war now, and launch their weapons from within as many civilian shield areas as possible, and they launch their weapons into largely civilian populations on the other side as possible.
Muslim combatants don't play by civilized rules. That kind of nonsense is for losers, and they want no part of such foolishness. They correctly understand that there really are no such thing as innocent civilians: populations support and are complicit in all combat operations. They feed, clothe and fund their soldiers. They work in the factories that provide arms and support for their soldiers. This is unarguably true for populations on both sides.
The bad guys know this plain fact of life. They see everyone that resists sharia law as a 'Little Eichmann.' And they know that all of us 'Little Eichmanns' do not have the same view, much to the advantage of Muslim terrorists.
It's time that the West started to view Muslim populations as 'Little Eichmanns' and act accordingly. Only until this happens, we will be forced to live the the atrocities we see Muslims commit in the name of Allah on the West and our philosophy.
The violence will never end until we come to our senses.
IMMIGRANT RIGHTS…… - ……………WHAT ARE THEY? And I believe the term should be ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT RIGHTS. What RIGHTS do people who broke the law have? I’d like your input on this...
2 hours ago