The cost of a 30-second ad during this year's Super Bowl would reportedly set you back $5,000,000 bucks. At first glance, it would seem that this would be a colossal waste of resources, and yet each and every available advertising slot during this year's game were gobbled up by businesses seeking 'eyeballs' to view the merits of their products.
The reason this marketing venue works is an old one: the Law of Large Numbers. Dumbing down the statistical explanation to my level, it just means that if you throw enough mud at a wall, sure; most of it will slough off and wind up on the floor. But a marginal amount of that mud will stick to the wall. And it is this marginal mud that keeps businesses afloat.
When I was studying marketing back in my college days (I got a degree in the stuff, woo hoo...), we would call this concept on ad effectiveness "reach." How many potential customers will view the pitch, and of those that see it, how many will be persuaded to dig into their wallets and fork over the cash? We now call this concept of marketing reach "eyeballs." An estimated 400,000,000 people watched this year's Super Bowl. That would be 796,838,397 eyeballs (not everybody has two eyeballs, but most do). That's a lot of eyeballs. And the sponsors of those ads will all see the revenues come pouring in, now that the missus and millions of her like minded ilk will head to the cleaning aisle at the Piggly Wiggly and grab herself a bottle of Mr, Clean. Why? Because a sexy Mr. Clean really mopped the floor in the Super Bowl ad this year, lots of eyeballs can't be wrong.
Enter politics and eyeballs. Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca), the nominal head of the Democrat Party now that Barry is no longer an elected official, when asked why her Democrats over the last 8 years have lost multiple gubernatorial races, many seats in Congress, and countless more at the state and local levels, seems to have an answer: she and her ilk didn't get the word out.
That's right, boys and girls. Red Nancy blames her party's woes on bad marketing: not enough eyeballs on their message. Hillary Clinton outspent The Donald by maybe 8 - 1, and the DNC probably outspent the RNC by 2-1 nationally. All of this spending was for ads, primarily blasting conservative values, spreading lies about what Democrats could do for our nation, etc.
Nancy, you guys got the word out. You reached those eyeballs. Here's what you and your liberal buddies don't get: when you put lipstick on a pig, at the end of the day, that glamorous pig is still a pig. Your message fell on deaf ears. Or, more pertinent to this post, all of the eyeballs that laid their vision on your lies and Utopian garbage saw it for what it was. Crap.
But go ahead, Nancy. Fire the old marketing guys, the ones you say didn't get the word out. Hire some new guys, guys who understand this 'eyeball' concept. That's what will get your power back, Nance. Those gavels will be back in your fingers before you know it. No, don't take a deep down look at what you stand for, and what American's don't believe in anymore. Don't toss all of that out. No, no. Keep it, and next time, just spend more money.
Get more eyeballs involved, Nancy. That's what you should do.
Is The Thrill Gone? - Once again WSF goes off on a murky political rant. You may want to read the bloggers on the sidebar instead. Some of my relatives are liberals, especially...
6 hours ago