Barack Obama would love nothing more than to destroy the Republican party and create one party rule. In that manner, he and his successors could get quite a lot done without that pesky 'Party of No.'
We already have several areas within the United States that are defacto one-party ruled: Detroit comes to mind as the poster boy of what happens when dissent to an out of control government is crushed and extinguished as a countervailing force in politics.
Barack's old stomping grounds of Chicago are also governed by one party only: the Democrat party. And this has been the case since "Big Bill" Thompson (R) was mayor ending in 1931, although "Big Bill" was so corrupt that he may as well have been a Democrat.
Chicago politics is now in play nationally, with Barack Obama ruling through executive orders and virtually ignoring the will of Congress and the American people. He learned this style of politics in the least democratic area in the US - The Windy City.
Just a few days ago, Chicago Public Schools' teacher's union boss Karen Lewis withdrew her name from the upcoming mayoral race, and it now appears that the current uber-liberal, big spending Democrat mayor Rahm Emanuel will not face any credible opposition.
This news of Karen Lewis' withdrawal was bemoaned as a loss of choice for the voters of Chicago, since Karen Lewis was running ahead of Rahm in the polls. The choice was never between the two dominant philosophies within the US currently: liberal or conservative. The choice Chicago voters would have had with Karen Lewis in the race was re-electing a big spending liberal in Rahm, or electing an even bigger spending liberal in Karen Lewis.
Not much of a choice, given that Chicago's public unions (including Karen Lewis' CPS teacher's union) are running billions of dollars of unfunded pension liabilities that has bankrupted Chicago to the point that it is another Detroit, only in zombie form - Chicago is fiscally dead but just doesn't know it yet, much like zombies are dead but don't seem to understand the concept.
IMMIGRANT RIGHTS…… - ……………WHAT ARE THEY? And I believe the term should be ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT RIGHTS. What RIGHTS do people who broke the law have? I’d like your input on this...
2 hours ago